dela
5170111823
Rewrite references/pedagogy.md around recite-vs-teach: reader model,
coverage density (sections_in is cite permission, not a to-do list),
intuition-before-formula three-beat, and paper-jump filling.
Every notes/sections/sec-*.tex must now answer gap / takeaway / jump /
omit above the first \section. lint.py checks presence only (it cannot
judge honesty); files opening with "% generated by" are exempt.
- scripts/lint.py: SP025 + is_writer_section / teach_gaps helpers
- tests/no-teach-block/: fixture with takeaway only, wired into test.sh
- examples/*: all 14 writer sections get real teach blocks
- SKILL.md, references/{agents,antipatterns,checklist}.md, DESIGN.md,
assets/notes-template.tex: route writers and consistency agent
through pedagogy.md
14 lines
545 B
TeX
14 lines
545 B
TeX
% teach:
|
||
% gap: 容易把损失画成前向链条上的下一个方块
|
||
% takeaway: 损失是侧路，不是主路上的一站
|
||
% jump: fixture 的框图没说清 $L$ 是挂在 $\hat y$ 之后还是在链条之内
|
||
% omit: 重复摘要的贡献条目
|
||
\section{主张与贡献}
|
||
\splabel{C1}
|
||
一次前向是 $x\to f_\theta\to\hat y$。损失在预测之后单独比较。
|
||
|
||
\spfig{F1}{一次前向与侧路损失。}{重绘自 fixture Figure~1；toolkit: \texttt{superfig}；ledger id: F1。}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{本章小结}
|
||
损失不是前向的一站。
|