dela
5170111823
Rewrite references/pedagogy.md around recite-vs-teach: reader model,
coverage density (sections_in is cite permission, not a to-do list),
intuition-before-formula three-beat, and paper-jump filling.
Every notes/sections/sec-*.tex must now answer gap / takeaway / jump /
omit above the first \section. lint.py checks presence only (it cannot
judge honesty); files opening with "% generated by" are exempt.
- scripts/lint.py: SP025 + is_writer_section / teach_gaps helpers
- tests/no-teach-block/: fixture with takeaway only, wired into test.sh
- examples/*: all 14 writer sections get real teach blocks
- SKILL.md, references/{agents,antipatterns,checklist}.md, DESIGN.md,
assets/notes-template.tex: route writers and consistency agent
through pedagogy.md
9 lines
369 B
TeX
9 lines
369 B
TeX
% teach:
|
|
% gap: 还没有一句能离开 PDF 复述的核心主张
|
|
% takeaway: 一次前向是 $x\to f_\theta\to\hat y$；损失在预测之后单独比较
|
|
% jump: none
|
|
% omit: 重复摘要的贡献条目
|
|
\section{主张与贡献}
|
|
\splabel{C1}
|
|
一次前向是 $x \to f_\theta \to \hat y$。损失 $L(\hat y,y)$ 在预测之后单独计算，不是主路上的一站。
|