feat: gate writer sections on a % teach: block (SP025)
Rewrite references/pedagogy.md around recite-vs-teach: reader model,
coverage density (sections_in is cite permission, not a to-do list),
intuition-before-formula three-beat, and paper-jump filling.
Every notes/sections/sec-*.tex must now answer gap / takeaway / jump /
omit above the first \section. lint.py checks presence only (it cannot
judge honesty); files opening with "% generated by" are exempt.
- scripts/lint.py: SP025 + is_writer_section / teach_gaps helpers
- tests/no-teach-block/: fixture with takeaway only, wired into test.sh
- examples/*: all 14 writer sections get real teach blocks
- SKILL.md, references/{agents,antipatterns,checklist}.md, DESIGN.md,
assets/notes-template.tex: route writers and consistency agent
through pedagogy.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ Must split when pages > 12 **or** top sections > 4 **or** redraws ≥ 2 **or** t
|
||||
|
||||
Writer jobs are lecture rows in `outline.md`, not `coverage.sections_in`. Outline writes `ledger.yaml`, `outline.md`, `notes.tex` inputs, and `F*.request.md`. Writers only touch their `sec-XX.tex`. Figure agents only see the request.
|
||||
|
||||
Outline, writers, and consistency read `references/pedagogy.md`. Consistency flags missing `% teach:` blocks and section-order recaps.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
$superpaper <源> 请 spawn 多 sub agents,隔离上下文:
|
||||
- 1 个 outline agent:ledger.yaml + outline.md
|
||||
- N 个 writer agents:sections/sec-XX.tex
|
||||
- N 个 writer agents:先读 references/pedagogy.md;sections/sec-XX.tex
|
||||
- 每个计划重绘图 1 个 figure agent:F*.request.md + sibling skill
|
||||
- 1 个 consistency agent:符号、术语、claim 覆盖
|
||||
- 1 个 consistency agent:符号、术语、claim 覆盖、是否复述(pedagogy.md)
|
||||
完成后用 scripts/lint.py 与 build.sh 收口。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Antipatterns
|
||||
|
||||
- Recapping the paper's sections in lecture clothing (see `pedagogy.md`).
|
||||
- Drawing a rewrite as `\sfnode` boxes (use `align`).
|
||||
- Sending a tensor-shape claim to superfig, or an architecture to supertensor.
|
||||
- Loading a figure `.sty` in the notes so sibling warnings leak into the article log.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# Delivery checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- Ledger written first; every core claim has `\splabel`.
|
||||
- Notes teach from a reader gap, not the paper's section order (`references/pedagogy.md`).
|
||||
- Every `sec-*.tex` opens with the four `% teach:` lines (`SP025`).
|
||||
- Formula three-beat present wherever display math appears.
|
||||
- Each figure toolkit matches `scripts/router.py`; mixed-class rows were split.
|
||||
- Notes do not `\usepackage{superfig|supertensor|superderive}`.
|
||||
|
||||
+232
-10
@@ -1,15 +1,237 @@
|
||||
# Pedagogy
|
||||
|
||||
Reuse `youtube-render-pdf` teaching order: motive → idea → mechanism → evidence → takeaway.
|
||||
Job: teach the argument thread. The paper is the source of claims, not
|
||||
the outline of the notes.
|
||||
|
||||
Paper-side changes:
|
||||
Section order is still motive → idea → mechanism → evidence → takeaway.
|
||||
That order is not a license to recap the PDF in a new sequence.
|
||||
|
||||
- Cite `§` / `Eq.(n)` / Figure / Table / page, not timestamps.
|
||||
- Front page is a bibliography card, not a PDF cover screenshot.
|
||||
- Math is `\[` or `align`, never `$$`.
|
||||
- Formula three-beat: Chinese motive, display math, flat symbol list.
|
||||
- `quotebox` for a short quotation with a source; no long PDF paste.
|
||||
- End major sections with `\subsection{本章小结}`; end the notes with `\section{总结与延伸}`.
|
||||
- Figures stay outside boxes.
|
||||
## Recite vs teach
|
||||
|
||||
Locked first/last titles: 「这篇论文在问什么」…「总结与延伸」, then appendix 符号表 / 推导链一览 / 图表清单.
|
||||
The default failure is a **closed-book failure**: a colleague who has
|
||||
not read this paper still cannot use the core claim, because the notes
|
||||
assume everything the paper assumes.
|
||||
|
||||
| | Recite | Teach |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Starts from | the paper's next subsection | what the reader still lacks |
|
||||
| Formula | "本节给出 Eq.(n)" then symbols | a world without the formula, then the formula |
|
||||
| Gap | whatever the paper already wrote | the jump the paper did not write |
|
||||
| Stops when | every cited paragraph is covered | the takeaway is usable |
|
||||
|
||||
Reader model: a competent colleague in the ambient field, textbook
|
||||
level. They have **not** read this paper, do not know its notation, and
|
||||
will not reconstruct skipped algebra. Do not reteach the ambient
|
||||
textbook (softmax, SGD, …) unless a core claim hangs on a twist.
|
||||
|
||||
If deleting the PDF would make the section unreadable as a lecture, it
|
||||
was a recap.
|
||||
|
||||
## Before each section
|
||||
|
||||
At the top of every writer `sec-XX.tex` (not `symbols.tex` / generated
|
||||
appendix), answer these four lines **before** the `\section`:
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% teach:
|
||||
% gap: <读者此刻还缺什么,不是论文小节标题>
|
||||
% takeaway: <离开本节必须带走的一句>
|
||||
% jump: <论文跳过、读者会卡住的那一步;没有则 none>
|
||||
% omit: <论文这里有、本讲义故意不写的>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- `gap` — entering deficit, in the reader's words.
|
||||
- `takeaway` — one sentence. This is also the `本章小结`.
|
||||
- `jump` — the missing why / scale / naive alternative / extreme case.
|
||||
- `omit` — ceremony you will not import "for completeness".
|
||||
|
||||
Do not start the body until all four are filled. `lint.py` enforces the
|
||||
four keys on every `notes/sections/sec-*.tex` as **`SP025`** (presence
|
||||
only — it cannot judge whether the answers are honest).
|
||||
|
||||
## Coverage density
|
||||
|
||||
`coverage.sections_in` is **cite permission**, not a to-do list.
|
||||
`ledger_ids` on the outline row are the teaching budget.
|
||||
|
||||
- Outline: fewer lecture rows than paper subsections. Merge until each
|
||||
row has **one** takeaway. A row per paper `\subsection` is too dense.
|
||||
- Writer: teach this row's ids. A paper paragraph that is not required
|
||||
for a `status: core` claim stays out.
|
||||
- Supporting claims: in only if they unblock a core claim.
|
||||
- Dropped claims: never.
|
||||
|
||||
Default skip (paper ceremony):
|
||||
|
||||
- "the rest of this paper is organized as follows"
|
||||
- related-work tour (keep the 2–3 contrasts that **define the gap**)
|
||||
- contribution bullets that restate the abstract
|
||||
- dataset / hyperparameter / hardware laundry lists, unless a core
|
||||
empirical claim hangs on a specific number
|
||||
- every ablation, every appendix proof, every lemma not on an
|
||||
`expand: true` derivation
|
||||
- notation paragraphs that only duplicate the symbol appendix
|
||||
|
||||
## Intuition before formulas
|
||||
|
||||
Display math is a three-beat that must not be split:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Intuition in Chinese, with the formula still off-stage.** Use at
|
||||
least one of: analogy, contrast with the naive move, extreme case
|
||||
(0 / 1 / ∞), or tiny numbers. 「下面给出公式」/「本节引入 Eq.(n)」
|
||||
is not a motive.
|
||||
2. `\[` or `align` / `aligned`. Never `$$`.
|
||||
3. Flat symbol list: one item per symbol — 符号 — 含义 — 定义处.
|
||||
|
||||
The section that owns the core mechanism then puts **one**
|
||||
`importantbox{如果你只记一件事}` with the takeaway sentence. At most
|
||||
one such box per major section. `本章小结` restates that sentence; it
|
||||
is not a new inventory.
|
||||
|
||||
Pick one intuition tool, not all four. A running numeric example is
|
||||
allowed when scale or cancellation is the point; it is not mandatory.
|
||||
|
||||
## Paper jumps
|
||||
|
||||
Papers skip the why, the scale, and the obvious alternative. Before
|
||||
mechanism, name the stall and fill it:
|
||||
|
||||
- Why this form, not the naive one?
|
||||
- What happens at 0 / 1 / ∞, or if the term is dropped?
|
||||
- Which quantity is a count vs a rate vs a scale?
|
||||
- Where does the gradient / information / mass actually flow?
|
||||
|
||||
Fill in prose or `warningbox`. If the paper is silent and you would
|
||||
have to invent a result, say it is silent — do not fabricate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Boxes and citations
|
||||
|
||||
| box | payload |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `importantbox` | walk-away: core claim, mechanism, 「如果你只记一件事」 |
|
||||
| `knowledgebox` | not the main thread: prerequisite, analogy, running example |
|
||||
| `warningbox` | naive-vs-correct, hidden assumption, paper-is-silent |
|
||||
| `quotebox` | short quotation + `§` / `Eq.(n)` in the title; ≲ 8 lines; no PDF paste |
|
||||
|
||||
Routine exposition stays in prose. Figures stay outside every box.
|
||||
|
||||
Cite `§` / `Eq.(n)` / Figure / Table / page, not timestamps. No
|
||||
`[cite]` placeholders. `\spsource{...}` at the point of use.
|
||||
|
||||
Front page is a bibliography card (title, authors, year, venue, arXiv),
|
||||
not a PDF-cover screenshot. Default language is Chinese.
|
||||
|
||||
End every major section with `\subsection{本章小结}`. End the notes
|
||||
with `\section{总结与延伸}` (limitations + compressed takeaways +
|
||||
open questions).
|
||||
|
||||
Locked first/last titles: 「这篇论文在问什么」…「总结与延伸」, then
|
||||
appendix 符号表 / 推导链一览 / 图表清单. Outline may add or drop
|
||||
middle sections; it may not rename or drop the lock.
|
||||
|
||||
Suggested skeleton (same lock as `assets/notes-template.tex`):
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
\section{这篇论文在问什么} % questions[] + motive
|
||||
\section{主张与贡献} % claims[status=core],\splabel{C*}
|
||||
\section{预备:定义、假设、符号} % D* / A* / 符号摘要;不是论文 §2 巡游
|
||||
% --- outline-chosen mechanism sections ---
|
||||
\section{实验与证据} % only E* that isolate a core claim
|
||||
\section{总结与延伸}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Antipatterns
|
||||
|
||||
Each pair is the same lecture beat. Left recites; right teaches.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Paper order, new wording
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% recite
|
||||
本文第 3 节提出 scaled dot-product attention。
|
||||
作者将 $Q$、$K$ 做点积,除以 $\sqrt{d_k}$,再 softmax 乘 $V$。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% teach
|
||||
% gap: 还以为「对齐再加权」就完了,不知道维数一涨会出什么事
|
||||
读者已经会「用相似度加权」。先看极端情况:$d_k$ 很大时,
|
||||
点积方差跟着涨,softmax 进饱和,梯度没了。
|
||||
除以 $\sqrt{d_k}$ 不是新算子,是把方差按回 1。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Formula with no off-stage intuition
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% recite
|
||||
本节引入如下公式:
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\mathrm{Attention}(Q,K,V)=\mathrm{softmax}(QK^{\top}/\sqrt{d_k})V.
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item $Q$ — query
|
||||
\item $K$ — key
|
||||
\item $d_k$ — key 维
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% teach
|
||||
两个随机向量的点积有多尖,随维数走。不先压方差,后面的 softmax 是死的。
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\mathrm{Attention}(Q,K,V)=\mathrm{softmax}(QK^{\top}/\sqrt{d_k})V.
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item $Q,K,V$ — query / key / value
|
||||
\item $d_k$ — key 维(shape parameter;缩放跟它走)
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\begin{importantbox}{如果你只记一件事}
|
||||
$\sqrt{d_k}$ 是改写,不是新注意力。
|
||||
\end{importantbox}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Paper jump left as 「如式所示」
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% recite
|
||||
如 Eq.(3) 所示,取 $A=d/H_{\mathrm{act}}$。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% teach
|
||||
% jump: 论文直接写下 A,没说为什么不是 1/N
|
||||
走得越宽,越要把输出缩小,否则残差被宽隐层撑爆。
|
||||
所以是 $A=d/H_{\mathrm{act}}$:宽 $4096$ 时 $A=1/4$,宽 $1024$ 时 $A=1$。
|
||||
不是 $1/N$——专家总数还没进这把尺子。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Ceremony imported for completeness
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% recite
|
||||
文献三条线:…(半页 related work)
|
||||
数据集为 ImageNet / CIFAR / …,硬件为 8$\times$A100,超参见表 7。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% teach
|
||||
% omit: related-work 巡游、数据集表、硬件
|
||||
现成方法把问题当静态参数;缺的是带延迟和互馈的那一截。
|
||||
经验数字只在它能隔离这个机制时才进正文。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. One lecture row per paper paragraph
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% recite
|
||||
\subsection{Lemma 2}
|
||||
\subsection{Lemma 3}
|
||||
\subsection{Ablation on dropout}
|
||||
\subsection{Ablation on warmup}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```tex
|
||||
% teach
|
||||
% omit: 不在 DER1 上的 lemma;不能隔离 C1 的 ablation
|
||||
只展开 DER1 用到的那一步。Ablation 只留「去掉这项,C1 是否还成立」。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user